![]() ![]() There’s the Sturm und Drang of Christ’s earth-shaking moment of doubt (“Father! Why have you forsaken me?”), followed by the ethereal quiet that inaugurates his tour through an unlived life there’s the tenderness of Christ’s guardian angel (Satan in the uncanny disguise of a benevolent child) kissing Jesus’s wounds after releasing him from the cross the shock and sublimity of Jesus having a child with Mary and the subsequent strangeness and mystery of his coupling with the sisters of Lazarus.Īnd, of course, there’s the undersung glory of Harvey Keitel as Judas (a part he first played in Mean Streets), in some ways the film’s hero, as tortured as Christ but saddled with the more difficult job. The final 40 minutes of The Last Temptation of Christ are among the richest and most emotionally complex of any film I’ve seen – wilfully perverse, ambiguous in ways that persist in haunting me, and dense with wonders. Photograph: Willy Sanjuan/Invision/AP ‘Scorsese’s most lucid expression of love for his medium and his religion’ It’s constant lesson I try to learn from him.Īri Aster. But with more maturity I discovered that for all the incredible brio of his style, he is a humanist who thinks very deeply about human nature. At first I was looking to find the kinetic energy in his way of editing movies, but I soon realised it was unmatchable. What I have learned from Scorsese is how he is always relentless in exploring every single detail, contradiction and power within a character. The doom they have to face, to be separated by the riles of society, losing innocence for ever. Marty goes from the bottom of the table all the way to the top showing the grandeur of the plan created by these monsters, and the solitude of these two. Everybody present knows they are making sure her and Newland are going to be separated for ever, and they do it by hosting the most gorgeous meal. To understand its display of violence, think of the scene at the end of the movie with the great dinner to celebrate the countess going back to Europe. The Age of Innocence in my view is one of the most violent movies ever made: it is about repression and oppression. He explores humankind and what comes with that, including violence. I don’t see him as a violent film-maker I think he’s unsentimental – as every real film-maker should be. It takes masterful details to do this kind of stuff – Scorsese is a master, and I salute him and celebrate him. This detail is almost like him opening her vagina with his own bare hands – it is one of the greatest and most erotic moments in cinema ever. Newland opens the countess’s glove and unbuttons it and then opens up the piece of leather that the glove is made of with his fingers and kisses her wrist. The other sequence I want to discuss is in The Age of Innocence, when Newland Archer and Countess Olenska, who have inexorably been falling in love throughout the entire movie, but always repressing what they feel, find themselves alone in a carriage. Those kind of moments are just unbeatable and amazing. ![]() It reminds me also of the way we ascend to heaven at the end of the Shine a Light documentary about the Rolling Stones, when the camera goes up, up, up. The idea that he can put together the life of Christ from the Kazantzakis novel with his own life in the land of cinema, and bring Jesus to heaven through the power of cinema, it is sublime. The camera lingers on Jesus, and then, to show him ascend to the heavens, Scorsese does one of the most beautiful and profound cinema gestures ever conceived: basically, he flickers the film, as if the film becomes a trip of light and is the way his Jesus goes to heaven. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |